Compare Cadillac CTS II vs Mercedes C-class W204 facelift vs Cadillac CT4

Variants
2.8L V6 AT
2.8L V6 MT
3.0L V6 AT
3.0L V6 AWD AT
3.0L V6 MT
3.6L V6 AT
3.6L V6 AWD AT
3.6L V6 MT
CTS-V AT
CTS-V MT
C 63 AMG
C 180
C 180 CDI
C 180 CDI MT
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY MT
C 250
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI 4MATIC
C 250 CDI MT
C 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4MATIC
C 350
C 350 4MATIC
C 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 63 AMG Performance
2.0 Turbo
2.0 Turbo AWD
2.7 Turbo
2.7 Turbo AWD
CT4-V
CT4-V BLACKWING

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft
303 L / 10.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 37.9 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1447 mm / 57.0 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2880 mm / 113.4 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2775 mm

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
8000 rpm
Final Drive
2.85
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2008
Debut
2019-10
Made In
US: Michigan, China: Shanghai

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
84%
85%
Pros
  • Gorgeous exterior design
  • Large V8 with manual transmission
  • Down to great 3.9s 0-100kph time
  • Up to 564hp output
  • Up to 747Nm of torque
  • Proven quite reliable
  • Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Reasonably reliable engine lineup
  • Good towing capacity
  • Beautiful design
  • Good build quality
  • Superb performance in the CT4-V
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.