Compare Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift vs Volvo XC40 vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift

Volvo XC40

Toyota C-HR facelift

Hyundai Kona (OS) faceliftVolvo XC40Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score29%32%42%
Pros
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.