Compare Hyundai Kona facelift vs Audi Q7 II vs Audi Q3 F3

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/40R19
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Body Style
Subcompact crossover
Colors
Sonic Blue, Phantom Black Pearl, Atlas White, Cyber Grey Metallic, Dark Knight Grey Pearl, Ignite Red, Performance Blue

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
8-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
74%
37%
Pros
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.