Compare Mercedes EQS vs Honda Clarity vs Honda Accord 9
Variants
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+
AMG EQS 53 4MATIC+ AMG DYNAMIC PLUS
EQS 350
EQS 450+
EQS 580 4MATIC
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1770 L / 62.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
400.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Sedan
Platform
Mercedes MEA
Dimensions
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
Size | Width
1926 mm / 75.8 in | 2125 mm / 83.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
3210 mm / 126.4 in
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Engine | Type
Permanently excited synchronous motor (PSM)
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-04-15 (Auto Shanghai 2021)
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
50%
25%
Pros
- Great performance
- Up to extraordinary 700km electric range
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.20 drag coefficient
- Distinct styling
- Fuel cell
- Superb exterior styling
Cons
- Extremely ugly
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Not meant for volume production
- Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
- Downgrade of suspension setup
- Wide use of CVTs
- No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.