Compare Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

Variants
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
TNGA: GA-B

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in

Performance

Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2021
2020
Debut
2021-02-18
2020-04-23
Made In
UK
Japan, France

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
27%
9%
Pros
  • Cheap to buy
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Waste of raw materials
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic equipment
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor handling
  • Bland

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.