Compare Chevrolet Bolt EUV vs Volvo XC40 vs Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 1611 L / 56.9 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
65.0 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1616 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4306 mm / 169.5 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Weight
1669.0 kg / 3679.5 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
250 miles (402 km)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Torque
266 lb-ft / 360 Nm
Engine | Type
Permanent magnetic drive motor
Final Drive
7.05:1
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-14
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
32%
21%
Pros
- Good for postering
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Ridiculous form factor
- Poor suspension setup
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.