Compare Jeep Wrangler JL vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 4th WK2
Variants
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Sahara
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.6 Rubicon
3.6 Rubicon MT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
68.3 cu ft
Coolant Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone, Solid axle
Short and long arm
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link, Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
18.5"
Water Fording
760 mm / 29.9 in
Dimensions
Size | Height
1760 mm
Size | Length
4821 mm
Size | Width
1938 mm
Wheelbase
2915 mm
Performance
CO2 Emission
195 g/km
Towing Capacity
3500 lbs
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L - 6.2 L
Engine | Type
V6 or V8, petrol or diesel
Fuel Capacity
24.6 gal
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ZF 8HP
Production
Debut
2019 New York Auto Show
Made In
US, Venezuela, Egypt
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
Pros
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Small turning circle
- High cargo capacity
- Powerful V6 engine
- Excellent off-road capability
- Comfortable to drive
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Nothing in particular
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.