Compare Hyundai Tucson 4 vs Mercedes GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253
Variants
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 PHEV AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 150
1.6 T-GDI 150 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV
1.6 T-GDI 150 MHEV DCT
1.6 T-GDI 180
1.6 T-GDI 180 MHEV AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 230 Hybrid AT
1.6 T-GDI Hybrid AWD AT
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
19.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.7 deg
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
Compact crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
925 mm
123 mm / 4.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2873 mm / 113.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
45.0 km / 28.0 mi
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Debut
2020-09-15
Made In
Korea, China, Brazil, India, Russia...
Reviews
Neofiliac score
31%
63%
60%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Some towing capacity
- Available with V8 AMG engines
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly
- Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.