HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Mercedes CLA C118 vs Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177

Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
13.4 deg
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
14.3 deg
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
4549 mm / 179.1 in
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.24
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in

Production

Debut
2020-09-02

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
35%
36%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.