Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Mercedes CLA C118 vs Skoda Superb 3 facelift
Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
13.4 deg
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
14.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.24
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Production
Debut
2020-09-02
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
35%
42%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent performance in the AMG models
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Ugly design
- 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
- No more V12
- Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.