Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Volkswagen Arteon

Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DCT
2.0 BiTDI 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 190 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TDI 190 DCT
2.0 TSI 190 DCT
2.0 TSI 268 4MOTION AT
2.0 TSI 268 AT
2.0 TSI 272 4MOTION DCT
2.0 TSI 280 4MOTION DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
Full-size sedan
4-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
1432 mm / 56.4 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.30
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018
Debut
2020-09-02

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
22%
39%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Good front-end design
  • Decent power output
Cons
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.