Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Mercedes E-class W213 vs Audi A4 B9 facelift

Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 MT
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 300e PHEV
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 350d Euro6d
E 350e PHEV
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI DCT
40 TDI ultra DCT
40 TDI ultra quattro DCT
40 TFSI 190 DCT
40 TFSI 204 DCT
40 TFSI (204 Hp) quattro ultra MHEV S tronic
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro ultra DCT
50 TDI quattro AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
Size | Length
4762 mm / 187.5 in
Size | Width
1847 mm / 72.7 in | 2022 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2939 mm / 115.7 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM

Production

Debut
2020-09-02

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
80%
63%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Undeniably great performance figures
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Multi-link suspension setup all-around
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent performance
  • Good suspension setup
Cons
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • AWD (4MATIC) is forced on consumers
  • Somewhat genertic styling
  • Downsized engined with lots of electronics
  • Too many displays (and distractions) inside
  • Unreliable drivetrain
  • Loaded with electronic nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.