Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs BMW 3 Series F30 vs BMW 3 Series F30 LCI
Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
316d
316d Euro6
316d AT
316d AT Euro6
316i
316i AT
318d
318d AT
318d xDrive
320d ED
320d ED AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive
320d xDrive AT
320i ED
320i
320i AT
320i xDrive
320i xDrive AT
325d
328i
328i AT
328i xDrive
328i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
335d xDrive AT
335i
335i AT
335i xDrive
335i xDrive AT
ActiveHybrid 3
316d
316d AT
318d
318d AT
318d xDrive
318i
318i AT
320d ED
320d ED AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive
320d xDrive AT
320i
320i AT
320i xDrive
320i xDrive AT
325d N47
325d N47 AT
325d B47
325d B47 AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e PHEV
330i
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
335d xDrive AT
340i
340i AT
340i xDrive
340i xDrive AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.7 kWh (gross)
7.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
293.0 V
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
Size | Length
4624 mm / 182.0 in
4633 mm / 182.4 in
Wheelbase
2810 mm / 110.6 in
2810 mm / 110.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
Electric Range
4.0 km / 2.5 mi
37.0 km / 23.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Euro 6
Production
Debut
2020-09-02
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
71%
73%
Pros
- Good performance
- Great comfort
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Great ZF 8HP automatic transmission
- Down to 4.8s 0-100kph time
- Up to 630Nm of torque
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- More reliable B58 and B48 engines
- Down to 4.8s 0-100kph time
- Up to 630Nm of torque
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Ugly design
- 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
- No more V12
- Questionable engine reliability
- Very short full-electric range
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- More generic design
- Getting too large for the "ultimate driving machine"
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.