HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes S-Class W223 vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S90 facelift

Variants
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC LWB
S 350d LWB
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d 4MATIC LWB
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 4MATIC LWB
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC LWB
S 580 4MATIC
S 580 4MATIC LWB
S 580e
S 580e 4MATIC
S 580e LWB
D3 Euro6
D3 Euro6d
D3 Euro6 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6 AT
D4 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T4 Euro6 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2018
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2017
T5 254PS AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 Euro6 AWD
T6 Euro6 AWD AT
T8 AWD Hybrid
T8 AWD PHEV
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 322 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
Full-size sedan
Platform
Mercedes-Benz MRA

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1503 mm / 59.2 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.22
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6D-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2020-09-02

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
70%
64%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great comfort
  • Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Elegant exterior design
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Ugly design
  • 4MATIC force-fed to the consumers
  • No more V12
  • Only available with small engines
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.