Compare Mercedes-AMG GT facelift vs Mercedes CLK C209 facelift vs Ford Mustang 5

Variants
GT
GT Black Series
GT C
GT R
GT S
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
3.7
3.7 AT
4.0
4.0 AT
GT 4.6
GT 4.6 AT
Shelby GT500 5.4 540
Shelby GT500 5.4 500
Shelby GT500 5.8

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Solid axle
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
2075 mm / 81.7 in (mirror unfolded)
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2630 mm / 103.5 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
3.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.35
Fuel Economy
12.8 L/100km
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Power
730 hp @ 6700-6900 rpm
Engine | Torque
800 Nm @ 2000-6000 rpm
Engine | Type
V8 biturbo M178 LS2 with Dry sump Lubrication
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Debut
2020-07-15
Made In
Germany

Reviews

Neofiliac score
91%
79%
75%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 730hp of power and 800Nm of torque
  • More focused than its predecessors
  • Good handling
  • RWD
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
  • Superb exterior styling
  • Great V8 choices
  • Manual widely available
  • Front-engine, RWD
Cons
  • Very tight inside
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.