HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Audi A3 Sportback 8V facelift vs Audi A3 8Y

Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DCT
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
e-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
g-tron 1.4 TFSI
g-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
8.8 kWh (gross) | 7.0 kWh (net)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4343 mm / 171.0 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2020-03

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
42%
41%
Pros
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Manual transmission widely available
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny or small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions in FWD models
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.