Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Skoda Scala

Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
1.0
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
Edition S

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
14.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
134 mm / 5.3 in
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1471 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4362 mm / 171.7 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1706 mm / 67.2 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
8%
12%
Pros
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling and comfort

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.