Compare Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Lexus CT 200h vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
Euro6
Euro5
1.6
2.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
31%
37%
Pros
- Decent build quality
- Decent performance
- Good handling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Overall good styling
- Characterful flat-4 engine
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.