Compare Hyundai i20 vs Toyota Yaris 3 vs Audi A1

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.0
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.33 Euro6 CVT
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D Euro6
1.4 D-4D
1.4
Hybrid Euro6
1.5
1.5 CVT
Hybrid
GRMN
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs
375 kg / 827 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1510 mm / 59.4 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
21%
22%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.