HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai i20 vs Renault Megane III vs Renault Clio V

Variants
1.0 T-GDi 100
1.0 T-GDi 100 DCT
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.0 T-GDi 120 DCT
1.2 MPi
i20 N
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
0.0 L / 0.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 262 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.6 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4295 mm / 169.1 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
1190.0 kg / 2623.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.9 m / 111.2 ft
CO2 Emission
158 g/km
Fuel Economy
7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
20%
19%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.