Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Toyota Corolla 7
Variants
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1435 mm
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4640 mm
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1780 mm
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2016-10-12
2018
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
64%
32%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Improved base engines
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Too many electronics
- Stupid emission control systems
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Not as good-looking as the hatchback
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.