Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs BMW M3 E90 vs BMW 3 Series F30

Variants
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
MT
DCT
CRT
316d
316d Euro6
316d AT
316d AT Euro6
316i
316i AT
318d
318d AT
318d xDrive
320d ED
320d ED AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive
320d xDrive AT
320i ED
320i
320i AT
320i xDrive
320i xDrive AT
325d
328i
328i AT
328i xDrive
328i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
335d xDrive AT
335i
335i AT
335i xDrive
335i xDrive AT
ActiveHybrid 3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
0.7 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Length
4624 mm / 182.0 in
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
1817 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2761 mm / 108.7 in
2810 mm / 110.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Electric Range
4.0 km / 2.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.0:1
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Debut
2016-10-12
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand

Reviews

Neofiliac score
83%
84%
71%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Improved base engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Fantastic S65 V8 engine
  • 6-speed manual transmission
  • Down to 4.4s 0-100kph time
  • Great ZF 8HP automatic transmission
  • Down to 4.8s 0-100kph time
  • Up to 630Nm of torque
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Too many electronics
  • Stupid emission control systems
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Exterior design doesn't match the performance level of the powertrain
  • Questionable engine reliability
  • Very short full-electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.