Compare Audi A3 8Y vs Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 308 III

Variants
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 VTi 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 e-HDI 115
1.6 HDI 92
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 THP 125
1.6 THP 156
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT
2.0 e-HDI 150
2.0 e-HDI 150 AT
GT 1.6 THP 205
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GTi 263
GTi 250
GTi 270
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Torsion
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4253 mm / 167.4 in
4367 mm / 171.9 in
Size | Width
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2020
2021
Debut
2020-03

Reviews

Neofiliac score
41%
21%
26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Engine durability low
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.