Compare Mercedes GLE W167 vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Koleos 2
Variants
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63
AMG GLE 63 S
GLE 300d
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 400d
GLE 450
GLE 580
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
23.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
31.2 kWh (gross) | 27.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
180 mm / 7.1 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1673 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4924 mm / 193.9 in
4227 mm / 166.4 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2995 mm / 117.9 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Electric Range
93.0 km / 57.8 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
15.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
9G-Tronic automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Debut
2018 Paris Motor Show
Made In
USA, Thailand, Indonesia
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
3%
28%
Pros
- Great performance
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Coherent exterior design
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Very ugly
- Poor build quality
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.