Compare Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door vs Audi A6 C8 vs Hyundai Sonata 7 LF

Variants
43 4MATIC+
53 4MATIC+
63 4MATIC+
63 S 4MATIC+
63 S E-Performance
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
1.6 T-GDi Eco
2.0 GDi Hybrid
2.0 GDi PHEV
2.0 T-GDi
2.4 GDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
12.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
14.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
400.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
5054 mm / 199.0 in
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1865 mm / 73.4 in
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1666.0 mm / 65.6 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2951 mm / 116.2 in
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.332
Electric Range
12.0 km / 7.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
7-speed / 8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT 9G automatic
DCT / automatic

Production

Debut
2018-09-26
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Made In
Germany
Germany, China, India

Reviews

Neofiliac score
77%
66%
34%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 639hp of power and tremendous 900Nm of torque
  • Decent handling
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good suspension setup
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Much more mature styling
  • No longer underpowered
Cons
  • Horrible bastardization of a good sports car
  • Ridiculous hunchback sedan form factor
  • AWD only
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Reliability concerns
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.