HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Volvo V40 Hatchback vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 177PS
D4 177PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
T2 120PS
T2 122PS
T2 122PS AT
T3 150PS
T3 152PS
T3 152PS AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T5 213PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T5 254PS AT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4369 mm / 172.0 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2647 mm / 104.2 in

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
35%
2%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
  • Volvo's iconic I5 engine
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.