HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs DS 4 II vs DS 3

Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 181 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
E-TENSE
PureTech 110
PureTech 110 AT
PureTech 130
VTi 82
VTi 82 AT
BlueHDi 120
BlueHDi 99
THP 165

Capacity

Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.5 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
189 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1458 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4400 mm / 173.2 in
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2061 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1715 mm / 67.5 in | 2004 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1467.0 mm / 57.8 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2464 mm / 97.0 in

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6.3
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
2016 ~ 2019
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
32%
18%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.