Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Skoda Scala

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247 Hatchback (2018)

Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1) Hatchback (2013-2019)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

B 160

B 180

B 180 DCT

B 180d

B 180d DCT

B 200

B 200 4MATIC DCT

B 200 DCT

B 200d DCT

B 220 4MATIC DCT

B 220 DCT

B 220d 4MATIC DCT

B 220d DCT

B 250 4MATIC DCT

B 250 DCT

B 250e DCT

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 86

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122 DSG

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.4i 90

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.6i 110 Hp

1.6i 110 AT

1.0

1.0 TSI 115

1.0 TSI 115 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.5 TSI

1.5 TSI DSG

1.6 TDI

1.6 TDI DSG

Edition S

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.4 deg

13.8 deg

14.7 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

9.4 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

17.2 deg

16.5 deg

14.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

15.6 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

104 mm / 4.1 in

134 mm / 5.3 in

149 mm / 5.9 in

Size | Height

1562 mm / 61.5 in

1471 mm / 57.9 in

Size | Length

4419 mm / 174.0 in

4362 mm / 171.7 in

Size | Width

1706 mm / 67.2 in

Track Width | Front

1567.0 mm / 61.7 in

1531.0 mm / 60.3 in

Track Width | Rear

1547.0 mm / 60.9 in

1516.0 mm / 59.7 in

Wheelbase

2729 mm / 107.4 in

2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Electric Range

70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.6:1

Transmission | Gears

6 / 7 / 8-speed

Transmission | Type

Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut

2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score

27%

12%

Pros

Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Better-looking than before

Low official fuel consumption

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Small turning circle

Cons

No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
Utilitarian

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Ugly
Poor performance
Only available with small engines
Poor handling and comfort

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.