Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs DS 4 vs DS 4 II

Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
PureTech 130
BlueHDi 120
BlueHDi 120 AT
THP 165 AT
THP 210
BlueHDi 150
BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 181 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
E-TENSE

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
359 L / 12.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
189 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4284 mm / 168.7 in
4400 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in | 2052 mm / 80.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2061 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1527.0 mm / 60.1 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
55.0 km / 34.2 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6.3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
6-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Automatic

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2021
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
17%
32%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.