Compare Toyota Supra 5 vs Toyota 86 vs Hyundai Coupe 2

Variants
2.0 197
2.0 258
3.0 340
86 AT
86
GT86
GT86 AT
1.6
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.7
2.7 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
315 kg / 694 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
255/35 ZR19 (front) / 275/35 ZR19 (rear)
215/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1292 mm
1285 mm / 50.6 in
1330 mm / 52.4 in
Size | Length
4379 mm
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1854 mm
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
7J x 16 H2
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Euro 4
Engine
FA20
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
BMW B58B30 turbo I6 or BMW B48B20 turbo I4
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Fuel Capacity
52 L
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Debut
2019 NAIAS
Made In
Austria

Reviews

Neofiliac score
88%
74%
22%
Pros
  • Punchy six-cylinder engine
  • Fantastic rear-wheel drive chassis
  • Superb styling
  • Great performance
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Great build quality
  • Decent suspension setup
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Tight interior
  • Only available with small engines
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bland styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not very well built

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.