Compare Audi Q3 Sportback (F3) vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Nissan Juke (F15)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Nissan Juke (F15)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Nissan Juke (F15)
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 DIG-T
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro6
1.5 dCi Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d
1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT
1.6 117PS
1.6 117PS CVT
1.6 94PS Euro6
1.6 94PS
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 DIG-T CVT
1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT
Nismo
Nismo AWD CVT
Nismo RS AWD CVT
Nismo RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%27%6%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • So ugly it's endearing
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible Renault engines
  • Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.