Compare Audi Q3 Sportback (F3) vs Volvo XC40 vs Ford Escape / Maverick / Mazda Tribute / Mercury Mariner

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Volvo XC40

Ford Escape / Maverick / Mazda Tribute / Mercury Mariner

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Volvo XC40Ford Escape / Maverick / Mazda Tribute / Mercury Mariner
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.3 Hybrid
2.3 Hybrid AWD
2.3
2.3 AWD
2.3 AWD AT
2.3 AT
3.0
3.0 AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score32%32%17%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Quite ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No real capabilities

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.