Compare BMW 3 Series G20 vs Honda Clarity vs Honda Civic 9 Sedan
Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320i AT
320i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i AT
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric
1.8 i-VTEC AT
1.8 i-VTEC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.6 m / 37.9 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1478 mm / 58.2 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4545 mm / 178.9 in
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
16 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
10.6:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
142.0 hp / 105.9 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
79.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
174 Nm / 128.3 lb-ft @ 4300 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2016
Made In
Germany, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand
Reviews
Neofiliac score
68%
50%
21%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Closed-deck engines
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Distinct styling
- Fuel cell
- Reliable engines and manual transmission
Cons
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Not meant for volume production
- Lack of fuel cell infrastructure
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.