Compare BMW 8 Series G15 vs Mercedes CLK C209 facelift vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift
Variants
840d Euro6d xDrive
840d xDrive
840i
840i Euro6d
840i Euro6d xDrive
840i xDrive
M850i Euro6d xDrive
M850i xDrive
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1627.0 mm / 64.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1642.0 mm / 64.6 in
Wheelbase
2822 mm / 111.1 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.27
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Debut
2018-06
Made In
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
79%
70%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Down to great 3.7s 0-100kph time
- Good performance-to-consumption ratio
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust drivetrain
- Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Looks too much like a Mustang
- Reliability concerns
- AWD
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- AWD nonsense
- Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
- Less durable engines
- Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.