Compare Mercedes-AMG SL R232 vs Mercedes SLK R171 vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
213 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
208 L / 7.3 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.3 L / 13.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 390 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 360 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Length
4705 mm / 185.2 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2430 mm / 95.7 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
CO2 Emission
268 ~ 288 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.32
0.37
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (combined)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6 b
Engine
M 177
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
88%
70%
80%
Pros
- Rather good performance
- Decent styling
- Good handling
- Good build quality
- Good SLK55 AMG drivetrain
- Sleek design
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- Obsession with AWD
- I4 engine in an SL
- Larger than before
- Low cargo capacity
- Engine problems with the M272 V6
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.