Compare Chevrolet Corvette C8 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 4 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 S550 Convertible facelift
Variants
Stingray 482
Stingray 495
Z06
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
2.3 EcoBoost
2.3 EcoBoost AT
5.0 GT
5.0 GT AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
357 L / 12.6 cu-ft
323 L / 11.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
21.8 L / 23.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
205 kg / 452 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
8.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
81 mm / 3.2 in
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4788 mm / 188.5 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in | 2080 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1933 mm / 76.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 8.5J x 19 Rear wheel rims: 11J x 20
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2722 mm / 107.2 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
3.5 sec
CO2 Emission
277 g/km
Fuel Economy
12.1 L/100km / 19.4 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
296.0 km/h / 183.9 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT / M1L
Production
Availability
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
95%
69%
85%
Pros
- Great handling characteristics
- Supercar-like performance in an affordable package
- Small block V8
- Glorious 8600rpm redline
- Good reliability record
- Available with V8 and manual transmission
- Handsome styling
- Good pricing
- RWD
Cons
- Average styling for its class
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.