Compare Mazda MX-5 IV (ND) vs BMW Z4 G29 vs BMW Z3 M Roadster E36/7

Mazda MX-5 IV (ND)

BMW Z4 G29

BMW Z3 M Roadster E36/7

Mazda MX-5 IV (ND)BMW Z4 G29BMW Z3 M Roadster E36/7
Variants
1.5 SkyActiv-G
1.5 SkyActiv-G 2018
2.0 SkyActiv-G 160
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 160
2.0 SkyActiv-G 160 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-G 181
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 181
2.0 SkyActiv-G 181 AT
RF 2.0 SkyActiv-G 181 AT
M40i
sDrive20i
sDrive20i MT
sDrive30i
S50
S54

Reviews

Neofiliac score86%77%66%
Pros
  • Rigid chassis
  • Slightly better built
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Small turning circle
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Equipped with B58 engine
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Still in RWD
  • Manual transmission
  • Good engines
  • Simple to work on
  • No BS driving experience
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Very little cargo space
  • Soft-top only
  • B58 capped by Euro 6d nonsense outside the USA
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very little cargo space
  • Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.