HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes CLA C118 vs Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177

Variants
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.3 deg
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4549 mm / 179.1 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
35%
22%
36%
Pros
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.