Compare Mercedes-Benz CLA C118 vs Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177

Mercedes-Benz CLA C118

Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290

Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177

Mercedes-Benz CLA C118Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290Mercedes-Benz A-Class V177
Variants
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
43 4MATIC+
53 4MATIC+
63 4MATIC+
63 S 4MATIC+
63 S E-Performance
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT

Reviews

Neofiliac score35%77%36%
Pros
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 639hp of power and tremendous 900Nm of torque
  • Decent handling
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Horrible bastardization of a good sports car
  • Ridiculous hunchback sedan form factor
  • AWD only
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.