Compare Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Jaguar F-Pace facelift vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift

Jaguar F-Pace facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 faceliftJaguar F-Pace faceliftMercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253
Variants
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
P400e
D165
D200
P250
D300
SVR
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score63%68%60%
Pros
  • Available with V8 AMG engines
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Mid-size crossover nonsense
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.