Compare Lamborghini Aventador vs Pagani Zonda vs Mercedes S-Class Coupe C217
Variants
Aventador LP 700-4
Aventador S LP 740-4
Aventador SuperVeloce LP 750-4
Aventador SVJ LP 770-4
Aventador LP 780-4 Ultimate
Zonda C12
Zonda C12-S
Zonda Cinque
Zonda F
Zonda Revolucion
Zonda S
Zonda Tricolore
S 63 AMG 4MATIC
S 63 AMG
S 65 AMG
S 400 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC
S 500
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
7.0 deg
11.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
10.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.3 deg
14.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Height
1136 mm / 44.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1675.0 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1660.0 mm / 65.4 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2945 mm / 115.9 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
30.0 m / 98.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Fuel Economy
20.0 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 10.0 L/100km / 23.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
340.0 km/h / 211.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
L539
Engine | Bore
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.8:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
6.5 L / 396.5 cu-in / 6498.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
76.4 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
ISR automated manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
94%
99%
92%
Pros
- Exceptional performance
- Improvement handling
- Superb NA V12 engineUp to glorious 8700rpm redline
- The most sensuous styling in the industry
- Exceptional AMG V12 engine
- Exceptionally luxurious
- Very light and nimble
- Still elegant and without association to the nouveau riche
- Updated M279 V12
- Luxurious interior
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Rather good styling
- S65 AMG remained RWD
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Somewhat conspicuous
- Expensive
- AWD nonsense
- No S600 Coupe
- Smaller than the C216
- Somewhat generic styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.