HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Lamborghini Aventador vs Audi R8 42 vs Lamborghini Huracan Spyder

Variants
Aventador LP 700-4
Aventador S LP 740-4
Aventador SuperVeloce LP 750-4
Aventador SVJ LP 770-4
Aventador LP 780-4 Ultimate
4.2 FSI 420
4.2 FSI 420 AMT
4.2 FSI 430
4.2 FSI 430 AMT
5.2 FSI 525
5.2 FSI 525 AMT
GT AMT
Huracán Evo RWD Spyder
Huracán Evo Spyder
Huracán LP 580-2 Spyder
Huracán LP 610-4 Spyder
Huracán LP 640-4 Performanté Spyder

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
22.0 L / 23.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
7.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
10.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.3 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
Material
Aluminium and carbon fiber

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1136 mm / 44.7 in
1252 mm / 49.3 in
1180 mm / 46.5 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1668.0 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
30.0 m / 98.4 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
L539
CSJ
Engine | Bore
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.8:1
12.5:1
12.7:1
Engine | Displacement
6.5 L / 396.5 cu-in / 6498.0 cc
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
76.4 mm / 3.0 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
ISR automated manual
Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Debut
2014 Geneva Auto Show
Made In
Italy

Reviews

Neofiliac score
94%
86%
95%
Pros
  • Exceptional performance
  • Improvement handling
  • Superb NA V12 engineUp to glorious 8700rpm redline
  • Wonderful dry sump engines
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Manual transmission
  • Iconic styling
  • Better deals compared to the Audi R8
  • Down to great 3.1s 0-100kph time
  • RWD available
Cons
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Very little cargo space
  • Somewhat conspicuous
  • AWD-only
  • Automated manual transmission
  • Awkward styling from some angles
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.