Compare Nissan GT-R R35 vs Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z
Variants
2008
2011
2013
2017
Nismo
Track Edition
MT
AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
11.3 L / 11.9 qt
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
105 mm / 4.1 in
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1370 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1895 mm / 74.6 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
0.28
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine
VR38DETT
FA20D
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.8 L / 231.8 cu-in / 3799.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
7500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
74%
81%
Pros
- Exceptional sprint time
- Great performance overall
- Superb handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low center of gravity
- Good balance
- Good handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Some reliability concerns
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on engine power
- MacPherson front suspension
- Low cargo capacity
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.