Compare Nissan 370Z vs Toyota 86 vs Nissan 200SX S15
Variants
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
86 AT
86
GT86
GT86 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/45 R17
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1285 mm / 50.6 in
1285 mm / 50.6 in
Size | Length
4445 mm / 175.0 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
16 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5 J
Engine
VQ37VHR
FA20
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2002
Reviews
Neofiliac score
81%
74%
72%
Pros
- Good handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Some reliability concerns
- Good exterior styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great build quality
- Good overall styling
- Small turning circle
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Only available with small engines
- Low cargo capacity
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Less handsome than the S14
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.