Compare Cadillac ATS Coupe vs BMW M4 F82 Coupe vs BMW 2 Series F22

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD
3.6 AT
3.6 AWD AT
ATS-V
ATS-V AT
M3
M3 DCT
M3 Competition
M3 Competition DCT
M3 CS DCT
M3 GTS DCT
218d B47
218d B47 AT
218d N47
218d N47 AT
218i
218i AT
220d B47 xDrive AT
220d N47
220d N47 AT
220i
220i AT
220i Euro6
220i Euro6 AT
225d B47 AT
225d N47 AT
228i
228i AT
230i
230i AT
M235i
M235i AT
M235i xDrive AT
M240i
M240i AT
M240i xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
445 L / 15.7 cu-ft
390 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
13.9 L / 14.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in
1870 mm / 73.6 in
1774 mm / 69.8 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2812 mm / 110.7 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Top Speed
298.0 km/h / 185.2 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine
S55B30
Engine | Bore
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.2:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 181.8 cu-in / 2979.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
89.6 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Twin-scroll turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-6 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Reviews

Neofiliac score
69%
86%
77%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Up to enjoyable 7200rpm redline
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good styling
  • Superb exterior styling
  • Great handling characteristics
  • Rather good S55 engine
  • Manual transmission
  • Better styled than the 1 Series Coupe E82
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very tight inside
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Some unreliable engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.