Compare Audi Q5 II facelift vs Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Nissan Qashqai 3
Variants
35 TDI DCT
40 TDI quattro ultra DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro ultra DCT
50 TDI quattro AT
50 TFSI e quattro DCT
55 TFSI e quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
381.0 V
Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4682 mm / 184.3 in
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1893 mm / 74.5 in | 2140 mm / 84.3 in (mirror unfolded)
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
Performance
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2018-07-25
2021-02-18
Made In
Hungary, China
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
56%
32%
3%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Cheap to buy
Cons
- Crossover nonsense
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.