Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551) vs Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Audi Q3 F3

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)

Mini Countryman F60 LCI

Audi Q3 F3Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2 (L551)Mini Countryman F60 LCI
Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
Cooper
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.5
Cooper D 1.5 AT
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
Cooper SE ALL4 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score37%27%32%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Limited utility

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.