Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Peugeot 3008 II facelift vs Peugeot 3008 II

Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
Hybrid
Hybrid4
1.6 PureTech 181 AT
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
20.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
29.0 deg
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
219 mm / 8.6 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1624 mm / 63.9 in
Size | Length
4447 mm / 175.1 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
21%
21%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor suspension setup
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.