HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Koleos

Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Size | Length
4227 mm / 166.4 in
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
3%
23%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Relatively adequate engines
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Very ugly
  • Poor build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.