Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Juke

Audi | Cars

Nissan | Cars

Variants

35 TDI quattro

35 TDI quattro DCT

35 TDI DCT

35 TDI Euro6d DCT

35 TFSI

35 TFSI Euro6d

35 TFSI Euro6d DCT

35 TFSI DCT

40 TDI quattro DCT

40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT

40 TFSI quattro DCT

45 TFSI quattro DCT

45 TFSI e DCT

1.3 140

1.3 158

1.3 AWD CVT

1.3 CVT

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

20.4 deg

22.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

17.6 deg

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

5-door mild-hybrid Crossover

5-door Crossover

Platform

Nissan CMF-C platform

Dimensions

Size | Height

1625 mm / 64.0 in

Size | Length

4425 mm / 174.2 in

Size | Width

1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1584.0 mm / 62.4 in

1580.0 mm / 62.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1576.0 mm / 62.0 in

1586.0 mm / 62.4 in

Wheelbase

2680 mm / 105.5 in

2665 mm / 104.9 in

2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

Electric Range

61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard

EURO 6d-ISC-FCM

Engine | Bore

72.2 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

81.3 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Type

Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2021

Debut

2021-02-18

Made In

Reviews

Neofiliac score

37%

Pros

Decent styling
Low fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Cheap to buy

So ugly it's endearing

Cons

No powerful engine options
Crossover nonsense
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Very ugly
Horrible build quality
Horrible 0-100kph time
Only available with tiny engines
Waste of raw materials

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.